Love them or hate them, Taurus has that kind of reputation. Here is some shooting and thoughts on the Taurus PT92.
top of page

Health, Fitness, Non-Apparatus Exercise, Unarmed Self-Defense, Firearms Self Defense
bottom of page
Health, Fitness, Non-Apparatus Exercise, Unarmed Self-Defense, Firearms Self Defense
The PX4 is on my list of guns that I would like to own along with the 92F. Some day - soon I hope.
Greg,
I have Beretta PX4 Storm SubCompact.
http://www.beretta.com/en-us/px4-storm-subcompact/
It is a reliable and accurate gun for carry. It has light recoil due to the barrel rotation. I purchased it for my wife, but as I have written before, she has a problem with recoil spring. So, now SubCompact is my toy.
Hi Bob. I try to make these firearms videos entertaining and informative. I don't have a Beretta handy to compare the two; albeit I looked at the Beretta Storm today, which has a polymer lower. Between what Beretta puts out now and what Taurus puts out now - I don't see much of a difference in quality; although I may be wrong. I remember, and that has been over two decades ago, the Beretta 96 being of a higher quality manufacture. But, while memory is often long, it can also be wrong. Time and shooting will tell how this PT92 holds up. The Beretta though, still has the sexier lines of the two guns.
Hi Greg,
I like Taurus PT92. My neighbor has one, and I factually did not see the difference in the accuracy between my Beretta M9 and his Taurus PT92. However, he told me that the quality of Taurus may be unstable, and that he is lucky to get the best gun. I think you too. Thanks for your videos, I love them.